7 Brand Architecture Examples to Inspire You in 2025

Building a powerful brand is more than just a great logo or a catchy slogan; it's about creating a clear, strategic framework that defines how your company, products, and services relate to one another. This framework is known as brand architecture. A well-designed architecture organizes your brand portfolio, clarifies your market positioning, and enhances customer understanding, ultimately driving growth and loyalty. Without it, companies risk brand confusion, market cannibalism, and wasted marketing spend. This structure acts as the blueprint for how customers perceive your entire ecosystem of offerings, from a single product to a global enterprise.

Getting this structure right prevents internal competition and ensures each marketing dollar contributes to a larger, cohesive brand story. It is the silent organizer that guides everything from packaging design to M&A integration strategy. For startup founders, it establishes a scalable foundation for future growth. For corporate managers, it provides a system to manage complexity and maximize portfolio value.

In this deep dive, we'll dissect seven distinct brand architecture examples from some of the world's most successful companies. We will go beyond surface-level descriptions to provide strategic analysis, actionable takeaways, and replicable methods you can apply to your own branding efforts. You will learn to identify the underlying logic behind major corporate structures and gain a practical toolkit for implementation. Whether you're defining your initial identity or managing a complex portfolio, understanding these models is the first step toward building a resilient and scalable brand. Let's explore the blueprints.

1. Branded House (Monolithic Architecture)

The Branded House model, also known as a monolithic architecture, is a strategy where a single, powerful master brand serves as the primary identifier across all of a company's products and services. In this structure, sub-brands or product lines are clearly presented as extensions of the parent, leveraging its established equity, reputation, and marketing power.

This approach creates a unified, consistent brand experience. Companies like Apple and Google are quintessential brand architecture examples of the Branded House model. When you see iPhone, iPad, or MacBook, the “Apple” brand is implicitly understood and dominant. Similarly, Google Search, Google Maps, and Google Drive all operate under the strong, central Google identity, creating a seamless ecosystem for users.

Strategic Analysis

The core of the Branded House strategy is efficiency and leverage. Marketing spend on the master brand benefits the entire portfolio, creating a powerful halo effect. A positive experience with one product, like the Tesla Model 3, directly strengthens the perception of other products, like the Model Y or the Cybertruck. This synergy simplifies marketing messages and builds immense brand equity concentrated in one place.

However, this model carries inherent risks. A significant failure or public relations crisis in one product line can tarnish the entire brand family. This interdependence demands unwavering commitment to quality and consistency across all offerings.

Strategic Insight: A Branded House thrives on a singular, powerful brand promise that is consistently delivered. The master brand acts as a guarantee of quality and experience, making it a critical asset that must be protected at all costs.

When to Use a Branded House

This architecture is most effective when:

  • Offerings share a common brand promise: All products and services align with the same core values and customer expectations.
  • The master brand has strong, positive equity: The parent brand is well-regarded and can lend credibility to new ventures.
  • Target audiences are similar: The customer base for different products overlaps significantly, allowing for unified marketing campaigns.
  • You aim for market dominance with a focused message: You want to build an iconic brand that is synonymous with its category. For more on this, you can learn about creating a brand identity and see how it connects with architecture.

Actionable Takeaways

To successfully implement a Branded House strategy, focus on these key tactics:

  • Invest Heavily in the Master Brand: All marketing efforts should primarily build the equity of the parent brand.
  • Maintain Strict Brand Guidelines: Ensure absolute consistency in visual identity, messaging, and customer experience across every touchpoint.
  • Reinforce with Naming: Use a descriptive naming convention (e.g., "Apple Watch," "Google Cloud") that clearly connects the product to the master brand.

The following diagram illustrates the simple, top-down structure of a Branded House, where all value flows from the central master brand.

This visualization clearly shows that the product lines are direct descendants of the Master Brand, highlighting the dependence and unified structure of this model.

2. House of Brands (Freestanding Architecture)

The House of Brands model, often called a freestanding architecture, is a strategy where a parent company owns a portfolio of individual brands that operate independently. Each brand has its own unique name, identity, target audience, and market position, with little to no visible connection to the parent company.

This approach allows a corporation to dominate multiple market segments, even if they conflict. Procter & Gamble (P&G) is a classic example of this model in action; consumers buy Tide for laundry, Pampers for diapers, and Gillette for razors, often without realizing they are all owned by P&G. This separation makes it one of the most powerful brand architecture examples for companies aiming for broad market penetration with distinct, specialized products.

Strategic Analysis

The core of the House of Brands strategy is market segmentation and risk insulation. It allows a company to launch products for highly specific niches or even competing audiences without diluting the positioning of its other brands. Unilever, for instance, can market Axe to young men and Dove to women focused on real beauty, two very different promises, without any brand confusion.

The primary drawback is the significant investment required. Each brand demands its own dedicated marketing budget, brand management team, and strategic plan, leading to higher operational costs and complexity. A famous corporate restructuring that grappled with this model was when Google created its parent company, Alphabet. For more on this, you can learn about what we have learned from Google’s decision to call itself Alphabet.

Strategic Insight: A House of Brands excels at capturing diverse market share. Each brand is a targeted weapon in the company’s arsenal, built to win a specific consumer segment. The parent company acts as a holding entity, providing resources and oversight while staying in the background.

When to Use a House of Brands

This architecture is most effective when:

  • You serve diverse markets: Your products cater to different customer segments with distinct needs and values.
  • You want to mitigate risk: A failure or scandal with one brand does not damage the reputation of the parent company or other brands in the portfolio.
  • Brands have conflicting positions: You own brands that compete with each other or have opposing brand promises.
  • You acquire brands with strong existing equity: It makes more sense to retain an acquired brand's loyal following than to absorb it into the master brand.

Actionable Takeaways

To successfully implement a House of Brands strategy, focus on these key tactics:

  • Establish Strong, Independent Brand Teams: Empower each brand with dedicated managers who have deep expertise in their specific market.
  • Define Clear Market Positions: Meticulously map out each brand’s target audience and unique value proposition to avoid internal cannibalization.
  • Allocate Resources Strategically: Invest in brands based on their growth potential and strategic importance to the overall portfolio, rather than treating all equally.

3. Endorsed Brands (Hybrid Architecture)

The Endorsed Brands model, often called a hybrid architecture, represents a strategic middle ground between the Branded House and the House of Brands. This approach allows individual products or sub-brands to have their own distinct identities and market presence while also receiving a formal endorsement or "stamp of approval" from the master brand. This connection lends credibility and trust to the sub-brand.

This architecture creates a powerful synergy, giving sub-brands the flexibility to target specific audiences while leveraging the reputation of the parent company. Marriott International offers one of the most well-known brand architecture examples of an endorsed model. Brands like Courtyard by Marriott, Residence Inn by Marriott, and Fairfield by Marriott each have a unique identity and value proposition, yet the "by Marriott" endorsement assures customers of a certain standard of quality and service, backed by the parent company's global reputation.

Strategic Analysis

The core of the Endorsed Brands strategy is to balance independence with assurance. Sub-brands can develop their own personality, marketing campaigns, and price points to appeal to niche markets, from budget-conscious travelers to luxury seekers. The parent brand's endorsement acts as a powerful quality cue, reducing perceived risk for consumers trying a new sub-brand for the first time.

This model allows a corporation to enter diverse markets without diluting the master brand's core identity. For example, Nestlé uses this strategy effectively with products like Kit Kat and Nescafé. While these brands are famous in their own right, the subtle "by Nestlé" endorsement reinforces a global promise of quality. However, the link between the parent and sub-brand must be carefully managed. The endorsement adds value only if the master brand maintains a strong, positive reputation.

Strategic Insight: The Endorsed Brands model is a game of association. The parent brand selectively transfers its equity to sub-brands, providing them with a competitive advantage. The success of this model depends on the parent brand adding tangible value (like trust or quality assurance) without overshadowing the sub-brand's unique identity.

When to Use an Endorsed Brand Architecture

This architecture is most effective when:

  • You want to enter new markets: It allows you to create distinct brands for different segments without confusing the identity of the master brand.
  • Sub-brands benefit from the parent's credibility: The endorsement provides a valuable advantage, especially for new or lesser-known product lines.
  • Sub-brands need their own identity: The products or services have unique characteristics that require separate branding and marketing.
  • You are managing a portfolio of acquired brands: An endorsement can integrate an acquired company into the corporate family while preserving its established brand equity.

Actionable Takeaways

To successfully implement an Endorsed Brands strategy, focus on these key tactics:

  • Define the Relationship Clearly: Establish a clear visual and verbal system for the endorsement so its role is instantly understood by consumers.
  • Ensure the Endorsement Adds Value: The master brand must have significant positive equity that benefits the sub-brand. If it doesn't, the endorsement is meaningless.
  • Maintain Consistent Quality Standards: A failure in one endorsed brand can negatively impact the perception of both the master brand and the entire portfolio. The parent's endorsement is a promise that must be kept.

4. Co-Branding Architecture

Co-branding architecture is a strategic marketing partnership where two or more independent brands collaborate on a single product or service. This alliance is designed to create a synergistic value proposition that leverages the combined strengths, brand equity, and customer bases of the participating companies. It is a powerful way for brands to enter new markets, enhance credibility, and create innovative offerings that would be difficult to achieve alone.

This model is distinct from other brand architecture examples because it involves an external partnership rather than an internal portfolio structure. Famous examples like the collaboration between Taco Bell and Doritos to create the Doritos Locos Tacos, or Nike and Apple for the Nike+ iPod Sport Kit, showcase how two powerhouse brands can merge their identities to create something new and highly desirable. The resulting product is mutually beneficial, driving sales and enhancing the image of both partners.

Strategic Analysis

The essence of a co-branding strategy is mutual gain and shared equity. Each brand brings its unique assets to the table, such as a loyal customer base, a specific brand perception, or a unique technology. The partnership between BMW and Louis Vuitton, for instance, combined automotive engineering excellence with high-fashion luxury to create custom-fitted luggage for the BMW i8. This move reinforced the premium positioning of both brands and appealed directly to a shared demographic of high-net-worth individuals.

However, co-branding is not without its risks. The primary danger is brand dilution or damage through association. If one partner experiences a public relations crisis, the negative perception can easily transfer to the other. Furthermore, a misalignment of brand values or poor execution can confuse consumers and weaken the equity of both brands involved, making partner selection and agreement clarity absolutely critical.

Strategic Insight: Successful co-branding relies on complementary strengths and shared brand DNA. The collaboration must feel authentic and create a product or experience that is greater than the sum of its parts, providing a clear, unique benefit to the consumer.

When to Use a Co-Branding Architecture

This architecture is most effective when:

  • You want to enter a new market: Partnering with an established brand in a target market can provide instant credibility and access.
  • Brand values and target audiences overlap: The partnership must feel natural to consumers, with both brands sharing similar quality standards and customer profiles.
  • You seek to enhance your brand's image: Associating with a highly regarded brand in another category can add a new dimension of prestige or innovation to your own.
  • You need to share financial costs and risks: Joint ventures allow for sharing the burden of development, manufacturing, and marketing for a new product.

Actionable Takeaways

To successfully implement a co-branding strategy, focus on these key tactics:

  • Choose Partners with Complementary Values: Conduct thorough due diligence to ensure your partner's brand reputation and values align perfectly with yours.
  • Establish Clear Partnership Agreements: Define roles, responsibilities, revenue sharing, and exit strategies in a legally binding contract to avoid future conflicts.
  • Ensure Brand Alignment in Execution: The final product and its marketing must seamlessly integrate both brand identities without one overshadowing the other.
  • Monitor Partnership Performance: Continuously track sales, customer feedback, and brand perception metrics to measure the ROI of the collaboration and make necessary adjustments.

5. Private Label Architecture

Private Label architecture is a strategy where retailers develop and market products under their own brand name, which are often manufactured by third parties. These "store brands" or "in-house brands" are sold exclusively in the retailer's own stores, competing directly with established national brands on the same shelves. This approach allows retailers to capture higher margins, control product quality, and build customer loyalty.

This model has become a dominant force in retail, with many private labels evolving from cheap alternatives into premium, trusted brands. Excellent brand architecture examples of this strategy include Costco's Kirkland Signature, Walmart's Great Value, and Target's Good & Gather. These brands leverage the retailer's existing distribution and customer trust to offer a compelling value proposition, blending quality with competitive pricing.

Strategic Analysis

The core of a Private Label strategy is control and value creation. By cutting out the national brand's marketing and distribution costs, retailers can offer similar quality products at a lower price point, directly benefiting the consumer and increasing their own profitability. A brand like Kirkland Signature has built such immense trust that customers often choose its products over well-known national brands, driving significant revenue and loyalty for Costco.

The primary risk lies in perception and quality control. If a private label product fails to meet customer expectations, it can damage the reputation of the retailer itself. This close association requires a rigorous commitment to sourcing, manufacturing, and consistent quality assurance to build and maintain the trust necessary for the brand to succeed.

Strategic Insight: A successful Private Label architecture transforms the retailer from a mere distributor into a trusted brand creator. The store brand acts as an endorsement from the retailer, signaling a promise of quality and value that strengthens the overall customer relationship.

When to Use a Private Label Architecture

This architecture is most effective when:

  • You have a strong, established retail presence: The model relies on an existing customer base and distribution channel.
  • There is a clear gap in the market: Retailers can fill a need for lower-priced alternatives or specific product attributes not offered by national brands.
  • You want to increase profit margins: Eliminating the "brand tax" of national manufacturers directly improves profitability.
  • Building long-term customer loyalty is a key goal: A beloved private label can become a primary reason for customers to shop at a particular store. To protect this valuable asset, it's crucial to avoid trademark infringement.

Actionable Takeaways

To successfully implement a Private Label strategy, focus on these key tactics:

  • Invest in Quality to Build Trust: Your product must consistently deliver on its promise. Don't treat it as a "cheap" alternative; treat it as a competitive brand.
  • Leverage In-Store Placement: Use premium shelf space and in-store marketing to give your private label brand a competitive advantage.
  • Create a Distinct Brand Identity: Develop compelling packaging and a clear value proposition that allows the brand to stand on its own.

6. Ingredient Branding Architecture

Ingredient Branding is a specialized brand architecture strategy where a component, material, or technology from one company is positioned as a distinct brand within a host product from another company. The ingredient brand is prominently marketed to the end consumer, creating a powerful co-branding effect that enhances the value and credibility of the final product.

This "brand within a brand" model allows component suppliers to build consumer-facing equity, transforming a behind-the-scenes commodity into a mark of quality. Classic brand architecture examples of this strategy include Intel's processors in PCs, Gore-Tex's waterproof fabric in outdoor gear, and Dolby's audio technology in home entertainment systems. Consumers don't just buy a laptop; they buy a laptop with "Intel Inside," a signal of performance and reliability.

Strategic Analysis

The core of Ingredient Branding is a symbiotic value exchange. The host brand benefits from the ingredient's established reputation, using it as a proof point to justify a premium price and differentiate itself from competitors. In turn, the ingredient brand gains massive market visibility and consumer trust by being featured in respected, high-quality products.

The "Intel Inside" campaign is a masterclass in this approach. By marketing directly to consumers, Intel created demand for its microprocessors, forcing PC manufacturers to feature the Intel logo to meet customer expectations. This strategy effectively lifted Intel from an anonymous supplier to a household name, creating a powerful competitive moat. However, the ingredient brand's reputation is inextricably linked to the performance of the host product, requiring careful partner selection.

Strategic Insight: Ingredient Branding succeeds by shifting the customer's focus from the final product alone to the critical components within it. The ingredient becomes a trusted feature and a key driver of the purchase decision.

When to Use Ingredient Branding

This architecture is most effective when:

  • The ingredient is critical to performance: The component significantly impacts the quality, functionality, or user experience of the final product.
  • The ingredient's benefit is easily communicated: Consumers can quickly understand why the ingredient makes the product better (e.g., faster, more durable, better sound).
  • The ingredient can be standardized: It can be consistently produced and integrated into various host products without losing its core qualities.
  • You aim to build long-term value beyond B2B sales: The goal is to create consumer preference and command a price premium for your component.

Actionable Takeaways

To successfully implement an Ingredient Branding strategy, focus on these key tactics:

  • Invest in Consumer Marketing: Market the ingredient brand directly to end-users to build awareness and preference. Create a "pull" effect where customers seek out products containing your component.
  • Establish Strict Partnership Criteria: Co-brand only with host products that meet high-quality standards to protect the ingredient's reputation.
  • Develop a Distinct Brand Identity: Create a clear logo, message, and brand promise for the ingredient that is easily recognizable and can be applied consistently across partner marketing.

7. Extension Brand Architecture

Extension Brand Architecture is a growth strategy where an established master brand stretches into new product categories or markets, leveraging its existing brand equity. This approach allows a company to enter new territories by capitalizing on the trust, recognition, and loyalty consumers already have for the parent brand. It's a calculated move to diversify offerings under a familiar and respected banner.

This model is distinct from a Branded House because the new ventures can be quite different from the original core product. For instance, Dyson, a brand synonymous with high-tech vacuum cleaners, successfully extended into personal care with hair dryers and home environment with air purifiers. These are powerful brand architecture examples of a company using its reputation for innovative engineering to validate its entry into seemingly unrelated markets.

Strategic Analysis

The core advantage of an Extension Brand Architecture is market penetration efficiency. Launching a new product in a new category is incredibly expensive and risky. By using a known brand name, companies like Amazon drastically reduce marketing costs and accelerate consumer adoption, as seen in its move from e-commerce to cloud services (AWS) and smart home devices (Echo). The parent brand acts as a seal of approval, promising a certain level of quality or innovation.

However, this strategy is fraught with the risk of brand dilution. If an extension fails to meet the standards set by the core brand, or if it feels disconnected from the brand's perceived expertise, it can damage the parent brand's reputation. A poorly received Harley-Davidson perfume, for example, could weaken the rugged, authentic image of its core motorcycle business. The key is ensuring a logical and authentic connection between the core brand and the new extension.

Strategic Insight: Successful brand extension hinges on transferring the core brand's promise and perceived value, not just its name. The extension must feel like a natural evolution of the brand's DNA, otherwise it risks confusing consumers and diluting brand equity.

When to Use Extension Brand Architecture

This architecture is most effective when:

  • The master brand has very high equity and a transferable promise: Your brand is known for a core competency (e.g., engineering, design, customer service) that can be applied to new categories.
  • The new category has a logical fit with the brand's values: The extension should make sense to your existing customer base, even if the product itself is different.
  • You aim to capture new market share and diversify revenue streams: You want to grow beyond your core market without the cost of building a new brand from scratch.
  • You can maintain quality and consistency: The new product must live up to or exceed the quality expectations associated with the parent brand.

Actionable Takeaways

To successfully implement an Extension Brand Architecture strategy, focus on these key tactics:

  • Audit Your Brand's Core Promise: Clearly define what your brand stands for (e.g., innovation, luxury, reliability) and ensure the extension authentically reflects it.
  • Test Market Acceptance: Before a full-scale launch, use pilot programs or limited releases to gauge consumer reaction and validate the extension's fit.
  • Bridge the Extension with Clear Messaging: Articulate why your brand is entering this new space. For Dyson, the bridge was its expertise in air-moving technology, connecting vacuums to hair dryers.

Brand Architecture Models: Key Features Comparison

Brand Architecture Type Implementation Complexity ? Resource Requirements ⚡ Expected Outcomes ? Ideal Use Cases ? Key Advantages ⭐
Branded House (Monolithic) Moderate: unified brand management Lower: centralized marketing efforts Strong brand recognition and economies of scale When unified brand identity drives value Cost-effective marketing, strong brand equity
House of Brands (Freestanding) High: multiple independent brands High: separate management and marketing Diversified risk, targeted segment coverage Diverse product categories needing distinct brands Risk diversification, premium positioning
Endorsed Brands (Hybrid) Moderate-High: dual brand management Moderate: shared and individual efforts Balanced flexibility and credibility Brands requiring parent backing plus sub-brand autonomy Leverages parent brand credibility, flexible positioning
Co-Branding Architecture High: partnership coordination Moderate: shared marketing and resources Increased market reach and innovation Strategic alliances for combined value propositions Access to new segments, shared costs
Private Label Architecture Moderate: brand building plus quality control Moderate: investment in quality and branding Higher retailer margins and customer loyalty Retailers seeking differentiation and control Greater control, competitive differentiation
Ingredient Branding Architecture Moderate-High: dual-brand integration Higher: joint marketing and compliance Enhanced product credibility and premium pricing Ingredient suppliers boosting brand awareness Increased brand awareness, premium pricing
Extension Brand Architecture Moderate: leveraging existing equity Lower-Moderate: reduced new product marketing Faster market entry, cross-selling opportunities Established brands entering new categories Faster acceptance, reduced marketing costs

Choosing Your Architectural Blueprint: The Path Forward

Navigating the landscape of brand architecture is akin to an architect designing a city. Each building, street, and public space must serve a specific purpose while contributing to a cohesive, functional, and aesthetically pleasing whole. As we have explored through detailed brand architecture examples, from the unified strength of a Branded House to the diverse portfolio of a House of Brands, the "right" choice is not a universal constant. It is a strategic decision deeply rooted in your company’s unique DNA, market position, and future aspirations.

The journey through these real-world case studies reveals a central theme: the most successful architectures are deliberate, not accidental. Google’s monolithic structure isn’t just about a shared name; it’s a strategic play to transfer trust and technological prowess across a vast ecosystem, making each new product feel like a natural extension of a familiar and reliable core. Conversely, Procter & Gamble’s freestanding model is a masterclass in market segmentation, allowing individual brands like Tide and Pampers to forge deep, specialized connections with distinct consumer groups without being constrained by a corporate identity.

Synthesizing the Strategic Takeaways

The models we've analyzed, from Marriott's masterful Endorsed Brand system to the symbiotic power of Co-Branding, are not just theoretical concepts. They are proven blueprints for market dominance, customer loyalty, and sustainable growth. Distilling these complex strategies down to their core principles provides a clear framework for your own decision-making process.

  • Clarity is Your North Star: The ultimate test of any brand architecture is its ability to reduce customer confusion. Does your structure make it easier for a consumer to understand what you offer, why it matters, and how your different products or services relate to one another? A clear architecture is the foundation of a seamless customer experience.
  • The Leverage vs. Isolate Dilemma: This is a critical strategic crossroads. Do your brands gain more power by sharing equity, resources, and reputation, as seen in a Branded House or Endorsed model? Or do they require strategic isolation to target niche audiences, mitigate reputational risk, or compete in conflicting market segments, which is the core strength of a House of Brands?
  • Build for Tomorrow, Not Just Today: Your brand architecture must be a dynamic and flexible framework, not a rigid cage. When selecting a model, project your business forward five to ten years. Will this structure accommodate new product lines, potential acquisitions, international expansion, or a pivot in market strategy? The best architectures are built to evolve.

From Blueprint to Reality

Ultimately, your brand architecture is the silent narrator of your company's story. It is the invisible force that organizes your portfolio, communicates value, and shapes customer perceptions before a single marketing message is even delivered. It works behind the scenes to build trust, create clarity, and drive commercial success. By carefully analyzing the brand architecture examples we've covered and aligning those insights with your core business objectives, you can move from theory to action.

The goal is to construct a powerful framework that not only supports your current operations but also paves the way for scalable, long-term growth. This structure will become your strategic compass, guiding every decision from product naming and brand positioning to mergers and acquisitions. When crafted with intention and foresight, your brand architecture becomes one of your most valuable competitive assets, creating a legacy that is both coherent and compelling.


Ready to lay the foundation of your brand architecture with the perfect names? A strong naming convention is critical for any model, and NameRobot provides the AI-powered tools to find brand, product, and company names that fit seamlessly into your strategic blueprint. Find memorable names that reinforce your architecture and resonate with your audience at NameRobot.


Written on 

Looking for creative name ideas?

With our NameRobot company name generator you can find the desired name for your business.

Naming Topics Sorted by Categories

building

The best tips & tricks on how to successfully find company names and other business names: How to come up with creative ideas? How to check whether company names are still available? How do you decide on the best name? In this category we write about all these questions concerning the right company and business name.

More
deliveries

Find out the dos and don'ts about developing new brand names and product names. What are promising brand naming strategies from planning to the introduction of the name? Learn how to create a brand name that stands out and can become a successful trademark.

More
add notes

In this category you will find examples of naming companies in all kinds of industries and on various topics. Learn more about rules and trends for names in your industry or profession.

More
brainstorming

Are you stuck in the naming process? Does the blank page paralyze you? With our naming inspiration techniques, you can fuel your imagination and get your mind going to generate great name ideas.

More
team spirit

About powerful name generators and naming tools: tools for word inspirations, name generators from acronyms to artificial names and helpful name checks. In this section, we introduce special naming tools in more detail.

More
contrast

Invented words or descriptive names, acronyms or existing words, or simply crazy-associative names: the possibilities for finding a business name are endless. Let's take a look at the most common name types for professional use.

More
judge

The most important facts about trademark law, registering a business name and everything else you need to know to secure your new name.

More
status update

What's going on in the naming world? Let's talk about the newest trends, important changes and the most common standards in business and product naming.

More
world

There's more than business names and brand names. Let's take a closer look at all kinds of names: geographical names, weekday names, traditional names, children and pet names...

More